Amen to Toolmonger for pointing out the contrast amoung Stanley’s ornate, antique screwdrivers and today’s less inspiring options.

From TM: "As a tool, the plastic-handled driver will most likely see more action
than the metal-handled work of art—but we’d love to have that choice."

I couldn’t agree more. But I’m open to a dissenting opinion. 

On one side, we have a product that’s weathered decades considering it’s well-made, beautiful, and worth keeping. On the other, we have a plastic product that’s just as functional, comparably durable, but ultimately disposable.

It’s not just Stanley’s fault—the misguided disposable materials mindset affects everything from the tools themselves to the
structures they build.

Antique iron tool vs. cheap plastic handle. Row houses vs. strip malls. Which do you think will
still be around decades from now?

And how has it happened that in the past few decades, that mentality has so pervaded our culture that it is now nearly impossible to find a tool that’s built with any sense of permanence?

I mean, it’s a screwdriver. It’s not a cell phone. It will never be obsolete. I want one I want to keep.

If I’m overlooking some examples of exceptional design, let me know.

More:

A recent soapbox screed about capability tools. Same gripe.

Our gallery of heirloom tools.

The informative, irritating Story of Stuff.